I just saw this new picture of nude Gwyneth Paltrow from British GQ on Defamer and thought "I can't believe I know this, but this looks exactly like a picture from the early '00s that Gwyneth later loudly complained about because she didn't like the way her butt looked."
Actually, I still think it could be the same picture or at least a recreation. Nope, it's real. She must just stand that weird way every time or something. But still, I can't believe I know mistakenly thought I knew that!
Update: This picture is much more embarrassing:
What a pretty little lass...
Posted by: Josh Rosen | May 13, 2008 at 10:17 PM
You promised me nakedness and the link doesn't go anywhere.
Posted by: Andy | May 14, 2008 at 02:49 AM
It's not a flattering picture of her butt. Is it the pose or is it simply not a flattering butt?
Posted by: eric | May 14, 2008 at 01:36 PM
She has the legs of a praying mantis.
Posted by: jerell | May 14, 2008 at 02:55 PM
Wait I'm confused. So there *are* two pictures of her standing like that or did Defamer just use the old one?
Posted by: katie | May 15, 2008 at 02:20 PM
There are two pics, and that is the new one that was on Defamer. I was totally wrong about it being the same pic, but I can't find the old one because it's been too long.
Posted by: lindsay | May 15, 2008 at 02:25 PM
It's easier to appreciate one's ass after having two kids, I think. It's like Nora Ephron says: The things you hate about your body at 35 are the things you're nostalgic for at 45.
Posted by: noelle | May 15, 2008 at 07:14 PM